Airship Restrictions
STATEMENT
Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure
Subcommittee
on Aviation
“Airspace
Restrictions”
Witness:
George A.R. Spyrou
Representing:
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Technical Committee of Lighter-than-air Division
October
17, 2001
Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Aviation Subcommittee . . . :
I
represent the Technical Committee of the Lighter-than-air Division of the
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), which includes
airships – otherwise know as dirigibles or “blimps”.
My role here is largely educational and to correct some misperceptions.
Since
September 11, all aviation – quite naturally – has been restricted.
Over
the past few weeks there has been an easing of restrictions for most aircraft
operations – even crop dusters - but not for airships.
On the contrary, we are specifically excluded from flying over major
cities and from operating over sports stadiums.
That is what we do for a living, however, and the present restrictions
not only prevent us from earning a living but also prevent us from providing a
service to law enforcement: we can provide a valuable “eye-in-the-sky”
for security personnel – just as we have done for various agencies for
decades, not only here in America but all over the world.
Our
association represents airship operators such as Goodyear, the Lightship Group,
the American Blimp Corporation, Airship Management Services and Airship
Operations. We have a total of 20
airships operating in America – each ship has a crew of 20 people and we
employ directly about 1,000 people. We
are a relatively small – but very visible business.
Airships,
or “blimps”, are principally known for advertising and television broadcast
work on behalf of such clients as Goodyear, Fujifilm, Met Life, Monster.com,
Ford Motor Company and Pepsi-Cola. What
is not generally known – and what we now want to draw more attention to – is
our security surveillance work with these aircraft
We can be useful to security – particularly now.
The
reason our aircraft make such excellent television camera platforms, is the same
reason that we are such excellent security surveillance platforms – safety,
long endurance and stability – not to mention providing reassuring messages.
Our aircraft have already been used for anti-terrorist work, and we would
be pleased to address this Committee and the Office of Homeland Security in this
regard separately.
But
first we have to operate again. In
order for us to operate effectively, however, we are requesting that the FAAease
or:
1.
Lift the restrictions on airships entering enhanced Class B
airspace as per FDC Notam #01/0613, Part II #7, which prevents airships from
flying over major cities and airports; and,
2.
Lift the Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR’s), FDC Notam #01/0298,
which prevent airships from flying over sporting events.
Lifting
these bans would allow the airship community to demonstrate how we can help on
security issues – at virtually no extra cost to law enforcement.
We can help prevent attacks by carrying surveillance equipment and
law enforcement personnel when flying over sports stadiums and other large
public gatherings.
We
can be part of the solution, not part of the problem, by providing
security personnel and law enforcement with an eye-in-the-sky capability.
In addition, we can provide a feeling of “normalcy” again.
What is more normal, after all, than a “blimp over a ballgame”?
There
is already an established track record of these aircraft for security
surveillance. Airships have been
used for
security surveillance over various events and for various agencies during the
past 50 years, including:
·
Convoy escort during
WWII, operated by the U.S. Navy escorting 89,000 vessels across the Atlantic –
without a single vessel lost.
·
Goodyear for U.S. Navy
since 1950’s
·
L.A. Olympics - 1984 (LAPD
– surveillance over the Games)
·
Economic Summit, Paris -
1989 (French Ministry of Interior – security surveillance)
·
Seoul Olympics - 1988
(Korean Security Services)
·
Tokyo Police – for
surveillance over Tokyo
·
British Ministry of
Defence – for security surveillance over U.K.
·
World Cup Soccer (over
Chicago with Secret Service for President Clinton)
·
Atlanta Olympics - 1996 (APD
and FBI – surveillance over Games)
·
Naval Air Warfare Center
- NAVAIR (for U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard)
·
Naval Investigative
Service (for President Reagan at Statue of Liberty)
·
“Mineseeker” program
by one of our members.
To
cite a specific example, when we flew over the Atlanta Olympics in 1996, we
carried cameras – which had day and night capability – providing images to
the Atlanta Police and the FBI. So,
someone at his monitor in Washington could see, real time, what we were filming
over Atlanta – from 3000 feet up. At
the request of law enforcement, we had to be discrete about this kind of work
previously. Now is the time for us
to do it more openly. Law
enforcement knew it, we knew it and now you should know it.
To do it, however, we need to fly again, and we want to reassure you, and
law enforcement, of our capabilities.
Modern
airships are safe, secured 24 hours per day, require specialist training to
operate, and they are slow. Naturally,
our business is being severely hampered by the current restrictions which we
believe to be unreasonable. However,
we provide an asset to law enforcement and the security services which is being
ignored.
We
are eager to provide a service and wish to have the opportunity to serve as best
we can – by flying again, providing a “normal” environment at sporting
events, and by actually benefiting the law enforcement community with an extra
security asset.
For
the record, I attach copies of Goodyear’s letters to the President, National
Security and the FAA, together with our letters to Senator Lieberman,
Congressman Shays and various other officials.
Our
request to the FAA is very simple: in lifting restrictions on the aviation
community, please include airships – specifically the Temporary Flight
Restrictions (TFR’s) which prevent us from flying over cities, and the
Enhanced Class B airspace which forbids us from flying over sporting events.
There
are three reasons for this request:
1.
We want to return to “normalcy” – so that young people, in
particular, are reassured by seeing a blimp over a ballgame again.
2.
We want to earn our living.
3.
We want to provide an asset for law enforcement; we can have law
enforcement personnel on board and carry surveillance equipment fitted to
provide an eye-in-the-sky capability to transmit images to the FBI and
other law enforcement personnel on the ground.
Our
aircraft can be a positive force – both psychologically, in terms of
morale, and in security terms.
Our
ships are safe (they cannot burn); they are slow (max 50 mph!); they are
secured at all times; and they require specialist training to operate (they
cannot be hijacked).
Our
members have already been contacted by various agencies for use of our aircraft
– in anticipation of restrictions being eased – and we would wish to respond
in a positive manner.
We
wish to return to making a positive contribution, and to be understood as an
asset – not a threat. We are not
part of the problem. Please permit
us to be part of the solution. We
want to lift up American’s spirits again.
Airships can help do that.
I
am particularly grateful for the support of our friends at Fujifilm and
Goodyear, and would now be pleased to answer any questions you may have.
Thank you.